Case Note & Summary
The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, Kokilaben Vinubhai Parmar and another, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 20/01/2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), District Court, Anand in MACP No.139 of 2012. The claim petition was filed under Section 163-A of the MV Act seeking compensation of Rs.4,31,900/- for the death of Vinubhai Parmar in a motor accident that occurred on 03/10/2012 at about 19:45 hrs on Kheda-Nadiad road near Raghvanaj cross. The deceased was driving vehicle GJ-23-S-8367 slowly on the left side when a tanker bearing registration GJ-6-Z-6384, driven rashly and negligently, dashed into the back of his vehicle, causing fatal injuries. The Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition, awarding Rs.1,03,650/- with 9% interest after deducting 70% on account of contributory negligence of the deceased. The claimants appealed contending that under Section 163-A, which is a no-fault liability provision, the Tribunal could not deduct any amount for contributory negligence. The High Court examined the nature of Section 163-A and held that it provides for compensation on a structured formula basis without requiring proof of fault. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in applying principles of contributory negligence and deducting 70% of the compensation. The Court set aside the deduction and recalculated the compensation as per the structured formula, awarding Rs.3,45,500/- with 9% interest from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization, along with proportionate costs. The appeal was allowed accordingly.
Headnote
A) Motor Accident Claims - Section 163-A MV Act - No-Fault Liability - Deduction for Contributory Negligence - The Tribunal deducted 70% of compensation on ground of deceased's contributory negligence, but Section 163-A is a no-fault provision where negligence of deceased cannot be assessed - Held that deduction for contributory negligence is not permissible under Section 163-A, and compensation must be awarded as per structured formula without such deduction (Paras 4-6). B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Structured Formula - Under Section 163-A, compensation is determined based on the structured formula in the Second Schedule, without regard to fault - The Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying principles of negligence and deducting 70%, and instead should have awarded the full amount as per the structured formula (Paras 5-6).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was justified in deducting 70% of the compensation amount on account of contributory negligence of the deceased while awarding compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which is a no-fault liability provision.
Final Decision
The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the deduction of 70% on account of contributory negligence, and awarded compensation of Rs.3,45,500/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization, along with proportionate costs. The impugned judgment and award was modified accordingly.
Law Points
- Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act
- 1988 is a no-fault liability provision
- contributory negligence cannot be assessed under it
- structured formula for compensation
- deduction for contributory negligence not permissible under Section 163-A




