Search Results for "Media Rights"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Removal of Petitioner's Name from Digital Records in Quashed Criminal Case — Right to be Forgotten Upheld. Petitioner's Right to Privacy under Article 21 Prevails Over Public Access to Quashed Proceedings.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Registrar General of the High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition Against Dismissal of Impleadment Application in Civil Suit. Petitioner, a former director, held to be a necessary party for effective adjudication of suit involving allegations of fraud and misrepresentation.

The petitioner, Mr. Gangadharappa Munindra Kumar @ Kumar G.M., filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable.

The petitioners, foreign nationals from various countries including Tanzania, Iran, Gujarat, Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, and others, were implicated in a case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Film Distribution Rights Dispute Over 'Sholay' and 'Sholay-3D'. The court held that a prima facie case for breach of contract and infringement of copyright was made out, warranting protection of the plaintiff's exclusive distribution rights pending trial.

The plaintiff, Narendra Hirawat And Co., filed a commercial IP suit seeking to enforce its exclusive distribution and exploitation rights in the films...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...