Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling and Holdings) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling and Holdings) Act"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Transfer Case Due to Violation of Section 29(3)(a) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Will Executed Without Prior Permission of Competent Authority for Class-II Occupancy Land Held Invalid.

20 Sep 2017

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant, Sakharam Shrawan Bhise, against the judgment of the lower appellate court which confirmed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Limitation Period for Suo-Motu Revision Not Specified, But Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time. Revisional Authority Initiated Proceedings After 17 Years, Which Was Held Unreasonable and Unsustainable Under Section 7 of the Act.

5 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Bajirao Jivanrao Patil, was the purchaser of agricultural land from Rupchand Chindhu Patil, whose predecessor-in-title had purchased t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Renewal of Kerosene Licence After 11 Years. The Court held that the petitioner, a women's self-help group, had no locus standi to challenge the renewal as the proclamation for a new licence was issued without considering the existing licence.

6 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Indira Women Saving Group (Mahila Bachat Gat) Yermala, a self-help women's group, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Ceiling Order Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Court Holds That Surplus Land Determination by Deputy Collector Was Valid and No Interference Warranted.

11 Mar 2011

The petitioners, Bhanudas, Vithal, and Pralhad Gaikwad, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Purchase Case — Failure of Tenant to Give Intimation Under Section 32F(1A) of B.T. & A.L. Act Results in Restoration of Tahsildar's Order. The revisional authority erred in setting aside the Tahsildar's findings without proper reasoning, and the tenant's failure to give intimation of the landlord's death disentitled him from purchasing the land.

17 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Smt. Tilotama Ramkrishna Joshi, claimed rights as the granddaughter of the deceased Smt. Gangabai, widow of Gopal Kulkarni, over two p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records Without Notice to Petitioner. Revenue Authority Directed to Decide Representation After Hearing All Parties Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Smt. Kausalyabai Kisand Dhande, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging a mutation entry made in the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petition for Succession Certificate Under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Widows and Minor Children of Deceased Coparceners Are Entitled to Equal Share in Joint Family Property Despite Objections by Male Coparceners.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, being the widows and minor children of deceased coparceners (Abhay Vithal Mandle, Raosaheb Vithal Mandle, and Baban Vithal Mandle), f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petition in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 with Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court held that findings of fact recorded by courts below were not perverse or erroneous and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the court...

6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)