Search Results for "MHADA cancellation"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Suit by Trustees of Public Charitable Trust for Declaration of Ownership of Suit Properties Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Defendant's Probate-Based Claim to Trust Properties and Alleged Trespass Prompted Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction.

The dispute arose between the trustees of the Banaji Limji Agiary Trust, a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Heard a Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Individuals Employed in Schools Against the State of Maharashtra and Education Department. Petitioners Sought Directions Regarding Their Service Conditions and Salary.

The matter involves a batch of writ petitions filed by several teachers and staff members of various private primary schools in the Nagpur region. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Discrepancies in Victim Statements and Young Age. Cousin Sister Alleged Sexual Assault but Court Found Inconsistencies in Her Statements and Possibility of Reformation of 20-Year-Old Accused.

The applicant, Ritik Suresh Millil, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Temporary Injunction to Restrain Alienation Pending Suit is Necessary Despite Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Court Revisits Its Earlier Decision in Sharad Mor's Case in the Context of Multiple Appeals from Orders Refusing Injunctions.

These appeals raised a common question about the necessity of granting a temporary injunction to restrain a defendant from creating third party intere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Perjury Against Trap Panch Witness for Giving Contradictory Testimony in Corruption Case. Witness's Inconsistent Statements in Chief and Cross-Examination Amounted to Perjury Under Section 193 IPC.

The appellant, Manikrao Shivram Wagh, was a trap panch witness in a corruption case (Special Case No.4/1999) against Samadhan Bhusari, who was tried f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Conviction of Trap Witness Under Section 344 CrPC for Alleged False Evidence in Corruption Case. Court Analyzed Whether Contradictory Statements During Cross-Examination Constituted Wilful Perjury as Defined Under Section 191 IPC.

The appellant was a panch witness in a corruption case tried by the Special Judge, Akola. The original case involved allegations that a Junior Enginee...