Search Results for "Karnataka State Civil Services (Transfer) Rules, 2018"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Karnataka State Civil Services (Transfer) Rules, 2018"

113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal Challenging Caste Verification Committee's Show Cause Notice — No Interference Required at Preliminary Stage. The court held that a show cause notice issued by a statutory authority does not warrant interference under writ jurisdiction at the preliminary stage, as the appellant has an opportunity to respond and raise all objections before the authority.

17 Apr 2026

The appellant, Shri G. Manjunatha, a Member of the Legislative Assembly, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru against a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Set-Off Claim in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that set-off is permissible during CIRP as it promotes efficiency and equity, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not automatically prohibit such adjustments when claims arise from mutual and connected transactions.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court involved a dispute between Bharti Airtel Limited and Bharti Hexacom Limited (Airtel entities) and Aircel Limited a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

17 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Policy on Outsourcing Class IV Posts in Aided Institutions Under Intermediate Education Act, 1921. Regulation 101, as amended, was held constitutional as a valid policy measure based on financial constraints and efficiency, under Section 9(4) of the Act, without violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

27 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging a judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

28 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Pharmacy Education, Overriding AICTE. The Pharmacy Act, 1948 is a complete code, and the word 'pharmacy' in Section 2(g) of the AICTE Act must be read down to exclude AICTE's regulatory power.

5 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of cases concerning the regulatory authority over pharmacy education in India. The dispute arose when the Pharma...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Reference to Larger Bench in Pension Dispute of U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Employees. Preetam Singh Judgment Held Binding on State and Board Regarding Pension Scheme Implementation.

10 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court heard a batch of special leave petitions arising from writ petitions filed by employees of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parisha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.

25 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)