Search Results for "Implied Repeal"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revenue Authorities' Demand for Unearned Income on Land Transfer; Holds Form HH Grant Under Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Had No Restraint on Alienation. Absence of Explicit Condition in Original Grant Meant Occupant Had Unrestricted Right to Transfer Property.

The dispute pertained to a plot of land in Suburban Scheme No.III, Chembur, originally granted by the Collector to one Gajanand Manishankar Bhatt unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Decree for Possession Due to Non-Compliance with Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Disclose Earlier Agreement for Sale, Barring Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance.

The appellants, original defendants, challenged the judgment and decree dated 14th October 2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty and Confiscation Orders in Sand Mining Cases for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for lack of hearing; matters remanded for fresh consideration.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. In Writ Petition No...