Search Results for "IPC Section 363"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Unproven Age and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Credible Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by Subhash Bharsakle and his mother Leelabai against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Attempt to Murder and Outraging Modesty of Minor Girl — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Corroborate Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 363, 354, and 307 IPC Sustained as Evidence Establishes Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Navnath Ramchandra Gaikwad, was convicted by the District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compounding of Kidnapping Offence Under Section 363 IPC After Compromise Between Accused and Victim. Court Permits Compounding of Non-Compoundable Offence in the Interest of Justice and to Promote Settlement Between Parties.

The appellant, Chandrakant @ Ramchandra Raghunath Karke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 359 of 1993 for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Consent and Voluntary Relationship. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Stay and Marriage-Like Relationship with Accused Negates Offences Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Pintukumar @ Jitendrakumar Chedilal Girigosavi, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...