Search Results for "Goa Land Use Act 1991"

185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Appellant Failed to Prove Higher Market Value for Land Acquired for Konkan Railway Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Shri Surendranath Sripad Sinai Dessai, owned land in Village Dhargal, Pernem Taluka, Goa, which was acquired for the Konkan Railway Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation from Rs.15 to Rs.9 per sq. metre for Paddy Fields Acquired for Konkan Railway. Reference Court erred in relying on an award for different land without considering potential for development.

The appellants, Special Land Acquisition Officer and Chief Engineer of Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., challenged the judgment and award dated 25.08....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Second Appeal Against Decree for Declaration and Injunction in Property Suit. Court Reviews Whether First Appellate Court Erred in Holding that Boundaries Prevailed Over Area in Sale Deed Without Proper Evidence.

This second appeal arose from a property dispute concerning survey numbers 46/3 and 46/4 in Valpoi, Goa. The plaintiffs (respondents in the appeal) ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...