downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
Search Results for "GST Demand"
246 result(s) found
Found 246 result(s)
High Court
High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations
25 Feb 2026The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...
- 587
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.
28 Nov 2024The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...
- 203
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Services by Municipal Corporation Under Article 243W Attract Nil Rate of Tax Under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The court held that show cause notices demanding service tax on services rendered by MCGM in relation to functions under Article 243W were without jurisdiction as the services are exempted.
11 Nov 2024The Bombay High Court dealt with a batch of writ petitions challenging show cause notices issued under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (C...
- 435
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Higher Interest on Refund of Seized Cash in GST Investigation — Circular on Pre-deposit Interest Not Applicable to Seized Amounts. Court held that interest on refund of cash seized during investigation should be at the rate actually earned on fixed deposit or 18% per annum, whichever is higher, to prevent unjust enrichment.
20 Sep 2024The case involves two writ petitions filed by Ramkaran Karwa and his son Samir Karwa against the Union of India and other GST authorities. The petitio...
- 948
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 17(2) of the PAN Rules, 2019 in GST Registration Cancellation Case. Rule requiring PAN Aadhaar linking for GST registration revival is intra vires the Finance Act, 2017 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
8 Dec 2020The petitioners, Raju Laxman Pachhapure and Amit Pramod Minache, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, Directs Substitution of Estimated Amount with Tax Dues as Per Adjudicated Order. The court held that for the purpose of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the 'tax dues' refer to the amount determined in the order-in-original, not the show cause notice, even if the order was set aside on appeal.
5 Nov 2020The three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the respondents' action in issuing forms SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 unde...
- 33
High Court
- 18
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.
25 Mar 2015The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...
- 28
High Court
- 21
