Search Results for "Execution petition maintainability"

971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of SARFAESI Act Auction Sale Where Title Derived from Alleged Forged Documents. Court Considers Whether Auction Purchaser is Entitled to Refund of Sale Consideration on Ground of Fraud.

The writ petition was filed by M/s Paramount Constructions Company challenging the sale certificate dated 10.10.2014 issued by the Authorised Officer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Partially Rejecting Amendment in Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act — Amendment Sought After Limitation Period Not Allowed as It Would Introduce New Grounds Beyond Scope of Section 34.

The Appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Bank's Petition Against Registrar's Refusal to Register Original Application in Debt Recovery Case. Registrar's Role is Ministerial and Cannot Decide Tenability Under Rule 5 of Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

The petitioner, Bank of India, a nationalized bank, had granted financial assistance to a limited company, with Ms. Avantika Chauhan as a guarantor. T...