Search Results for "Customs Duty Exemption"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Inputs Used in Exempted Goods, Partially Allows Revenue's Appeals on Education Cess. Tractors are exempted goods despite education cess, but separate accounts are required under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The judgment concerns multiple appeals filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Assessee) and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Revenue) against a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Customs and FERA Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Possession of Smuggled Currency Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 135(1)(a)(i) and 135(1)(b)(i) of Customs Act, 1962.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Amalio Simoes, by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Disabled Petitioner to Import Car Without Customs Clearance Permit Under Central Government Policy for Physically Handicapped Persons. The court permitted clearance of the modified car under the exemption order, holding that the policy did not require a Customs Clearance Permit.

The petitioner, Kirti M. Kothari, a disabled person suffering from Polio affecting his left arm, imported a car with appropriate modifications under a...