Search Results for "Bihar and Orissa Excise Act"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Illegal Detention Without Production on Remand Date. Failure to Produce Accused Physically or Virtually on 22 March 2022 Renders Remand Order Invalid and Detention Illegal.

The petitioner, Sushil Lohiya, filed a habeas corpus petition on behalf of his son Brijesh Lohiya, who was an accused in an offence registered under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Directors in Cooperative Society Vehicle Misuse Case Under Section 78(1) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioners failed to prove vehicle use for society work, burden of proof not discharged.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by directors of a cooperative society challenging orders passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Refusing Transfer of Company Petition. Chairman's Quasi-Judicial Order Held Amenable to Section 10F but Lacks Power to Transfer Part-Heard Matter or Constitute Special Bench.

The appeal arose from an order of the Chairman, Company Law Board (CLB) rejecting an application to transfer a partly-heard company petition from the ...