Search Results for "Best Five policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Best Five policy"

481 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC Based on Reliable Eyewitness Testimony. The court found sufficient evidence to establish guilt under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, rejecting claims of false implication and benefit of doubt.

24 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a murder conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant, along with two co-accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Approval for Appointment of Assistant Teachers in Private Aided Schools — Held That Educational Qualifications Must Be Considered as on Date of Appointment, Not Date of Application, and That Government Resolutions Cannot Override Statutory Rules Under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

18 Apr 2024

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by individual teachers and educational institutions challenging the refusal of the Education Officer ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against DNA Test Order in Divorce Case, Upholding Marital Presumption of Paternity. The Court Held That the Presumption Under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Cannot Be Rebutted by DNA Evidence Alone Without Proof of Non-Access, Protecting the Child's Legitimacy and Privacy Rights.

20 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a divorce petition filed by the husband under Sections 13(1)(i) and (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging adultery by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Tender Dispute, Restoring Authority's Decision on Technical Disqualification. The Court held that judicial review of tender decisions is limited to examining arbitrariness, and the tender inviting authority's interpretation of 'same or similar category products' was not perverse or irrational, thus upholding the rejection of the bid based on past performance criteria.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a Notice Inviting Tender issued by Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti for the supply of tablets for school children. The tender inc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Non-Compliance of Settlement in Joint Venture Dispute — Reciprocal Obligations Not Fulfilled by Either Party. Court finds no wilful disobedience as both Seth Group and Mittal Group failed to comply with their respective obligations under the Memorandum of Settlement dated 4.5.2015.

24 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed three contempt petitions arising from a joint venture dispute between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group over the develop...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Insurance Claim Repudiation Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Previous Claim. Duty of Utmost Good Faith Requires Full Disclosure of Material Facts in Proposal Form Under Indian Contract Act, 1872.

1 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which partly allowed the insurer's appeal against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Diamond Bourse Suspension — Private Association's Internal Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. The court held that the Bharat Diamond Bourse, as a private company, had the right to regulate its membership and premises, and its actions were not amenable to writ jurisdiction or public law remedies.

16 Aug 2016

The plaintiffs, VSM Diamonds Pvt Ltd and three individuals, filed a suit against Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB), a company incorporated under Section 25 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)