Search Results for "Belated challenge"

714 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 714 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging CGIT Award Setting Aside Dismissal of Clerk for Misappropriation. Reinstatement with 60% Backwages Upheld as Enquiry Findings Were Perverse and Bank Failed to Lead Evidence.

The Petitioner-Bank (Bank of Baroda, successor of Dena Bank) challenged the Part-II and Final Awards of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CG...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment Orders Quashed and Remanded for Fresh Hearing Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Siemens Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed multiple writ petitions challenging assessment orders pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Income Tax Officer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior sanction from the Central Government are invalid as the officer was not removable from service without such sanction.

The petitioner, Shri Nai Pal Singh, an employee of the Income Tax Department working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...