Search Results for "Article 16(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Article 16(3)"

368 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 368 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Interstate Arrest and Transit of Detenu in Criminal Case — Custody Found Legal Under Article 22 of Constitution of India. Arrest and Transit from Tamil Nadu to Uttar Pradesh Held Valid as Detenu Was Apprehended Based on Pending FIR and Remand Orders Were Properly Obtained.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Keshaw Anand, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to detenu, violating Article 22(5) right to make effective representation.

31 Jul 2024

The appellant, wife of detenu Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji, challenged the detention order dated 31.08.2023 passed under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Pay Parity of Secretarial Staff at Goa Bench with Principal Seat. The court held that under Article 229 of the Constitution, the Chief Justice's recommendation for pay upgradation is binding on the State, and the State cannot refuse implementation on grounds of financial implications or differences in retirement age.

30 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of two writ petitions filed by Secretarial Staff of the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking implementation of up...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Jurisdiction Dispute — Private Agreement Cannot Oust Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court held that Clause 21 of the All India Chess Federation's Constitution, conferring exclusive jurisdiction on Chennai courts, cannot bar the Bombay High Court from entertaining a writ petition under Article 226.

29 Jul 2019

The present appeal arose from a dispute between the Maharashtra Chess Association (Appellant) and the All India Chess Federation (second Respondent), ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

12 Feb 2019

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

12 Feb 2019

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

12 Oct 2018

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.

1 Jul 2016

The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Drilling Contract Dispute, Dismisses DDL's Cross-Challenge on Interest. Court upholds award of US$ 2,699,235.63 for wellhead tools and services but denies pre-award interest under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 May 2012

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)