Search Results for "Abeyance Memorandum"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.

Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against High Court Transfer: Government Notification Appointing District Judge Invalid for Lack of Consultation Under Article 233 of Constitution. Invalid Notification Did Not Bind High Court Which Had Power to Transfer Officer.

The petitioner, an Additional District and Sessions Judge in Bihar, challenged the Patna High Court's order transferring him from Arrah to Singhbhum a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Determines Factual Enquiry Whether Share Transfer Resulted in Members Exceeding Fifty. Enquiry Directed by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014 Following Dispute Over Validity of Pre-emption Rights in Articles of Association.

The appeal was placed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay following a remand order by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition by Professor Against Transfer Order Pending Departmental Inquiry. Petition Challenges Orders Relating to Leave Regularization and Inquiry Report Under Rule 14 of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

The writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenged an order dated 19 June 2017 issued by the Under Secretary (Health), Public Health ...