Search Results for "ADR judgment"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Accused in NIA Case Under UAPA for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Trial. Appellant Granted Bail as Prosecution Failed to Establish Direct Link to Conspiracy in Antilia Bomb Scare Case.

The appellant, Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma, was accused No. 10 in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under various sections of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Antilia Bomb Scare Case - Offences Bailable Under IPC Sections 120-B and 201. Appellant charged only with criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence, not under UAPA, entitling him to bail as a matter of right.

The appellant, Riyazuddin Hisamuddin Kazi, was arrested in connection with NIA RC 01/2021/NIA/MUM for offences under Sections 120-B and 201 IPC, arisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive — Appellant's Suspicion and Ill-treatment of Wife Led to Fatal Assault.

The appellant, Digambar Shashikant Shinde, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Vijaya. The prosecution case was that the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder by Burning: Conviction Based on Child Witness Testimony and Dying Declaration. The court affirmed that a child witness's testimony, if credible, can form the basis of conviction under Section 302 IPC without corroboration.

The appellant, Suresh Malhari Gaware, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Raziyabi Nashir Khan under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's conviction for killing his wife by strangulation confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

The appellant, Jitendra Motilal Nirmal, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Savitribai. The cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen Together, and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vikas Suresh Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, for the murder of his wife Janabai under Section 302 IPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals, Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case. Evidence of Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence Proves Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34, IPC.

The appeals challenged the conviction of two accused by the Sessions Court for murder and causing disappearance of evidence. The prosecution's case wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Conviction of Seven Accused in Murder-Robbery Case for Non-Compliance of Section 313 CrPC. Failure to Provide Proper Opportunity to Explain Incriminating Circumstances Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Vitiates Trial.

The High Court of Bombay heard five criminal appeals arising from the conviction of seven accused under Section 396 read with Section 34 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Further Investigation Application in Death Case. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Applications Were Filed After Trial Commenced and Key Witnesses Examined.

The petitioner, Rabia Khan, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 16.09.2021 passed by the Special Ju...