Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

552 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 552 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Liberal Interpretation of Delay Condonation Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. High Court Erred in Dismissing Delay Condonation Application for 45 Days Without Considering Beneficial Nature of Legislation.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, aged 26, died in a collision with a negligently parked truck on 15.04.2011. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside SDO's Possession Order Under Section 120(c) of MTAL Act — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Revision Beyond Limitation and Allowing Amendment Without Notice.

The petitioner, a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, owned agricultural land survey 209 admeasuring 35 acres at mouza Umarkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Considers Challenge to Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Inam Appeal. Question Involves Whether Service Inam Lands Are Exempt from Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954, and Whether Appeal Should Be Decided on Merits Despite Limitation.

The writ petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial IP Suit — Delay of 410 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Policy Changes and Preoccupation of Legal Team Held Not to Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.

The case involves a commercial IP suit filed by Metro Shoes Ltd (Plaintiff) against Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. and Tech-Connect Retail Pvt. Ltd. (Defend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...