Search Results for "res judicata not made out"

946 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 946 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Charity Commissioner's Scheme in Trust Dispute. Court upholds exclusive jurisdiction of Charity Commissioner under Section 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 to frame scheme for public trust.

The petitioners, who were trustees of a trust, filed writ petitions challenging the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner framing a scheme for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Medical College Admission Process — Upholds Institutional Preference and Reservation Policy. Institutional preference by minority unaided medical colleges is permissible under Article 30(1) of the Constitution and does not violate Article 14.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by students challenging the admission process for MBBS/BDS courses in medical colleges in Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC applied as plaint disclosed no cause of action and was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, original defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 28.11.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Maintainability Objections Against State’s Criminal Revision Application in Double Jeopardy Case. Second Revision by State Against Discharge of Accused on Double Jeopardy Ground Held Not Barred by Section 397(3) CrPC.

The petitioner, State through Police Inspector, CID Crime Branch, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court at Goa against an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...