Search Results for "proximate time"

812 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 812 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Delay of Three Months in Passing Order Without Explanation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Santosh @ Dankya Subhash Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention passed against him on 17.11.2004 by the Commissioner of Police, Pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Absence of Proximate Cause of Death. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or abetment to suicide beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Annasaheb Dhondiram Dhokane, Jijabai Dhondiram Dhokane, Kumari Bharti Dhondiram Dhokane, and Sau Meera Raosaheb Dod, were convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Murderer in Strangulation Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen, Recovery of Weapon, and Medical Evidence Established Murder Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Lalitkumar Laxminarayan Sharma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Jyoti Radheshyam Tripathi. The incident occurred ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty or Abetment. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC Set Aside as Allegations of Ill-Treatment Surfaced Only After Suicide and No Proximate Link Established.

The appellant, Pandurang Sadashiv Pimpalkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for offences under Sections 498-A and 306 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Detenu's Exoneration in Adjudication Proceedings Not Considered by Detaining Authority, Rendering Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Bherchand Tikaji Bora, challenged an order of detention dated 27th August 1998 passed under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...