Search Results for "prohibition officer"

2366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Non-Resident Employees Held as Salary, Not Business Income. Section 28(va) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply to employment-related payments.

The appeal was filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Customs Duty Payable on Redemption of Confiscated Goods Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 — Interest Under Section 28AB Also Attracts. Redemption fine does not substitute duty; duty and interest are separate liabilities.

The Supreme Court adjudicated two questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962: whether customs duty is payable when confiscated goods are redeemed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 13-Year-Old Show Cause Notice for Inordinate Delay in Adjudication — Failure to Adjudicate Within Reasonable Time Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Statutory Scheme Under Finance Act, 1994

The petitioner, UPL Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...