Search Results for "compromise order"

1690 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1690 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Amend Plaint After 14 Years. Amendment Sought to Introduce New Case of Fraud and Collusion Rejected as Barred by Limitation and Laches.

The appeal arose from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the appellant, Minakshi Mahendra Pitroda, against the respondents. The suit proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Conversion of Divorce Petition to Mutual Consent Divorce Without Proper Consent. Family Court's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife, Mrs. Bharti Bhausaheb Aher, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.6.2015 passed by the Principal Judge, Family C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC — Confirms Three-Year Rigorous Imprisonment and Compensation of Rs.70,000. Revision Petition Dismissed as Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law on Cruelty and Demand for Dowry Are Not Shown to Be Perverse or Unreasonable.

The revision petitioner, Babanrao Dnyandoba Shinde, was the husband of the informant Suvarna Shinde. Their marriage was solemnized in 1993. The wife a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Reference to Mamlatdar for Tenancy Determination in Land Dispute. The court held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to decide tenancy issues and must refer them to the Mamlatdar under Section 58 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/02/2000 passed in Special Civil Suit No.108/1979, whereby the learned Judge ordere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...