Bombay High Court Hears Group of Writ Petitions for Quashing of Communication and Remand. Petitions Related to Plot Numbers in Survey No. 198 A/2, Village Kargaon, and Rule Made Returnable Forthwith.
1 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "administrative proceedings"
4286 result(s) found
Found 4286 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.
24 Mar 2017The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...
- 22
High Court
High Court Quashes KSAT Order and Restores Deputation of Civil Servant; Holds Borrowing Department Cannot Unilaterally Terminate Deputation Without Consulting Lending Department. Borrowing department's unilateral cancellation of deputation and repatriation without consultation with lending department held contrary to Rule 50 of Karnataka Civil Services Rules and Government Order dated 19.11.1981, requiring prior consultation before cutting short tenure.
28 Sep 2020The litigation arose from a civil servant's challenge to the unilateral termination of his deputation by the borrowing department and the subsequent d...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tribunal Order in Deputation Termination Case; Reinstates Petitioner to Deputation Post. Unilateral Termination of Deputation by Borrowing Department Without Consulting Lending Department Held Contrary to Rules and Fair Procedure Under Rule 50 of Karnataka Civil Services Rules and Government Order Dated 19.11.1981.
28 Sep 2020The High Court of Karnataka considered a writ petition challenging the order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSAT) which had dismissed...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.
23 Dec 2015The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objection on Locus Standi, Holds That Non-Production of Degree Certificates Does Not Defeat Public Interest Challenge to Bank's Campus Recruitment Policy; Relies on D.C. Wadhwa. Members of the public may challenge executive recruitment practices as unconstitutional under Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution, without having to prove personal eligibility at the threshold.
1 Apr 2013The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by four individuals challenging the recruitment policy of Central Bank of I...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Against Tender Disqualification in Hospital PPP Project. Bid Rejected as Non-Responsive Due to Asterisks and Alleged Violation of Finance Department Concurrence Rules Under Rules of Business of the Government of Goa, 1991.
12 Aug 2011The writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arose out of a tender process for the development, operation and management of a 290-bedded D...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.
26 Aug 2024The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...
- 519
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 477
