Search Results for "account closure"

976 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 976 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability - Compensation Enhanced to Rs. 2,00,000. The court held that the Tribunal erred in not awarding compensation for permanent disability and loss of future earnings under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Milind Sharad Pendharkar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Upholds Conviction of Appellant Under Section 304 Part I IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. Appellant convicted for causing death by knife injury, also convicted under Section 324 IPC for causing hurt by dangerous weapon.

The appellant, Shaikh Harun s/o Shaikh Hasan, along with his two brothers Shaikh Hussain and Shaikh Rafiq, were charged for offences punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Impleadment of Proprietor's Wife in Money Suit. Order I Rule 10(2) CPC Allows Impleadment of Necessary Party for Effective Adjudication of Dispute Arising from Dishonoured Cheque Issued for Business Loan.

The revision petitioner, K. Balasathiya Narayanan, filed a civil suit (O.S. No.176 of 2019) before the Principal District Court, Erode, against the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naga @ Nagaraj @ Nagesh, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-V, Mysuru in S.C. No. 208 of 2005 for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reopening of Partition Permitted Due to Non-Inclusion of Joint Family Property. The Court held that a prior partition decree not binding on the plaintiff as she was not a party and the property was joint family property.

The appellant, Monakka Shinde, filed a suit (O.S. 370/2004) for reopening of partition, declaration, and injunction against her sons, Maruti Shinde an...