Search Results for "Tenant Revision"

1049 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1049 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Sub-Tenants in Commercial Premises Dispute. Change in Partnership Constitutes Subletting Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (original defendant nos.5, 6, and 8) challenging a decree of eviction passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings on Tenancy Rights Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Petitioners failed to establish ownership of well under Section 38E as they were never declared protected tenants.

The petitioners, Bhaurao Saluba Ekande and Jija Saluba Ekande, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Hears Challenge to Revision Order and De-occupation Notice Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Petitioner claims unauthorized construction on temple land is minor and below permission threshold; temple asserts petitioner has no tenancy rights.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a revision order passed by the first respondent under Section 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Eviction Decree — Failure to Consider Rent Control Act Bar. The Court held that the Wakf Tribunal must first determine applicability of Rent Control Act before proceeding with eviction suit under Section 89(3) of Wakf Act, 1995.

The case involves two civil revision applications filed under Section 89(3) of the Wakf Act, 1995 read with Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...