Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1697 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1697 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Between Brothers. Court Holds That a Suit for Partition Is Not Barred by Limitation When the Plaintiff Is in Joint Possession and the Property Is Ancestral.

The appellant, Shivaji Gopal Kurhade, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral agricultural land against his brothers and their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Execution Court Order Dismissing Application to Set Aside Auction Sale for Non-Compliance with Order XXI Rule 84 CPC. Failure to Deposit 25% of Purchase Money on the Same Day as Sale Renders Auction Void.

The appellants, who were judgment debtors in execution proceedings, filed an application under Order XXI Rule 90 read with Section 151 CPC to set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the appellants (legal representatives of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Against Restoration of Possession in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Set Aside Without Notice to Decree Holder Violates Natural Justice. Order XXI Rule 99 CPC Application Cannot Be Decided Without Hearing the Decree Holder.

The petitioner, Smt. Leelavathi, filed a civil revision petition under Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964, challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Saguvali Chit in Land Grant Case — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Assistant Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Hearing Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Sri B.L. Janardhana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...