Search Results for "revenue tribunal"

3347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Case on Handling Charges. Handling charges for registration of motor cycles are not part of sale price under Section 2(25) of MVAT Act, 2002.

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which set aside tax on handling charges collected by the respondent, a dea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Ice Cream Is Not 'Sweet and Sweetmeats' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Ice cream is a distinct commodity not covered by Notification Entry 374 for reduced tax rate under Schedule Entry C-II-35(1).

The case concerns M/s. Vadilal Dairy International Ltd., a registered dealer and manufacturer of ice cream under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Validity of Retrospective Amendment to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Amendment Deeming Refining of Oil as Manufacture is Challenged as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Godrej Soaps Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...