Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days. Mere 'Seen' Remark on Application Under Section 316(5) BNS Does Not Constitute Valid Extension of Remand Under Section 187(3) BNSS.

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Section 138 N.I. Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheques Were Issued as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence of Simple Imprisonment and Compensation.

The applicant, Rekha Mahindra Shah, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of three cheques totaling Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Ignoring Material Evidence and Misreading Documents. Mortgage by Conditional Sale Held Not Extinguished by Mere Delay; Right to Redeem Survives Under Section 60 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant (original plaintiff) filed a suit for redemption of mortgage of a shop in Borsad, Anand. The plaintiff had executed two mortgage by cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of Delay of 3117 Days in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Sufficient Cause. Liberal Approach Adopted for Illiterate Claimants Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed for condonation of delay in preferring first appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...