Search Results for "illegal recovery"

3321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Power of Municipal Commissioner to Revoke Occupancy Certificate in Challenge by Co-operative Society and Developer. Core Issue: Whether Municipal Commissioner Had Authority to Cancel Occupancy Certificate Granted Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The writ petition was filed by M/s. Satra Plaza Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Writ Petition by Employer Bank Against Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Reinstatement — Workman Status Under Industrial Disputes Act Contested. Court Examines Whether Termination Based on Settlement Clause Was Justified and Whether Back Wages Should Be Awarded.

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Goa Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. challenging an award dated 30.08.2003 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice Not Validly Served Under Section 15(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Appellate Bench's decree set aside for failure to consider jurisdictional issue of service of demand notice.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendant-tenant, Ms. Gloria Lois Crasto, challenging the judgment and decree dated 2 M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...