Search Results for "evidence cancellation"

2018 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2018 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.

The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Complainant's Petition to Set Aside Evidence and Transfer Trial in Cheating Case. Earlier Evidence Recorded with Translator Who Was a Witness Nullified by Prior High Court Order, Fresh Evidence Recorded in Compliance.

The petitioner-complainant filed a complaint on 18.3.2010 alleging illicit relationship and intimidation against the accused, leading to filing of cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court partly allowed Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld However order for imposition of cost set aside -- Petitioner Challenge to Conviction and Sentence Fails

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act -- The petitioner was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Unregulated Stem Cell Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Court Examines Legality Under Drugs Act and Lays Down Permissibility of Such Therapies in Clinical Trial Settings Only.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Yash Charitable Trust and others before the Supreme Court, raising concerns about the rampant promotion a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

FIRST APPEAL NO.514 OF 2014

The appeal arose from a suit dismissed by the trial court for mandatory injunction seeking execution of an agreement for sale of a flat under the Maha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case.

The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no....