Search Results for "enhancement without cross appeal"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. Time Was Not the Essence of Contract, but Plaintiff's Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Hence Decree for Specific Performance Set Aside.

The case involves two first appeals arising from a common judgment and decree dated 10.1.2008 passed by the III Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Third Party. Insurer Liable Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite Stationary Vehicle, as Negligence of Other Driver Proved.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the sons of the deceased, Rukminibai Ramayya Kamtam, who died in a road accident on 16 April 2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deemed Employee of Owner Covered Under Policy. Loading-unloading labourer travelling with goods is an employee of the owner of goods, not the vehicle owner, but insurer liable under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, in MACP ...