Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Third Party. Insurer Liable Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite Stationary Vehicle, as Negligence of Other Driver Proved.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the sons of the deceased, Rukminibai Ramayya Kamtam, who died in a road accident on 16 April 2010. The deceased was a passenger in a Tavera Jeep (MH-13-AC-1013) owned by respondent no.3 and insured by the appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. While the vehicle was stopped for a nature call on the Solapur-Hyderabad highway, the deceased was returning to the Jeep when an Omni car (AP-37-IH-2456) driven in a zigzag manner at high speed hit the Tavera Jeep, causing fatal injuries to the deceased. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Solapur, seeking compensation. The Tribunal awarded Rs.8,96,550/- with interest at 7.5% per annum, holding the owner and insurer of the Tavera Jeep jointly and severally liable. The insurer appealed, arguing that the accident was caused solely by the Omni car and that the insured vehicle was stationary, thus no liability could attach to it. The High Court, after considering the evidence and submissions, held that the negligence of the Omni car driver was established, but the Tribunal's finding of joint liability against the insurer of the Tavera Jeep was erroneous. However, the court noted that the appeal was dismissed by consent of the parties, and the compensation amount was already deposited. The court upheld the award, finding no merit in the appeal. The court also disposed of the civil application for withdrawal of the amount.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Negligence - Third-Party Liability - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court upheld the award of compensation to the claimants for the death of their mother, who was hit by a speeding Omni car while boarding a stationary Tavera Jeep. The court held that the negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle was established, and the insurer of the Tavera Jeep was not liable as the accident was not caused by the insured vehicle. However, the court found that the Tribunal had correctly held the owner and insurer of the Tavera Jeep jointly and severally liable under Section 166, as the deceased was a third party and the accident occurred while she was alighting from the insured vehicle. The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the compensation of Rs.8,96,550/- with interest at 7.5% per annum. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-insurer is liable to pay compensation for the death of a third party when the insured vehicle was stationary and the accident was caused by another vehicle.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The First Appeal is dismissed. The judgment and award dated 3rd December, 2015 passed by M.A.C.T., Solapur in M.A.C.P. No. 258 of 2010 is confirmed. Civil Application No. 3766 of 2019 is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Negligence
  • Third-party liability
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Insurance liability
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (05) 14

First Appeal No. 665 of 2019 with Civil Application No. 3766 of 2019

2020-05-19

R.D. Dhanuka

Mr. Amol Gatne for the Appellant, Mr. R.S. Alange for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the Applicants in CAF/3766/2019

United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Mr. Shriniwas Ramayya Kamtam, Mr. Chandramogali Ramayya Kamtam, Mr. Mohamad Hassan Md. Khajasab

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against judgment and award of M.A.C.T., Solapur in M.A.C.P. No. 258 of 2010.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (insurer) sought to set aside the award of compensation of Rs.8,96,550/- with interest.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the award on the ground that the accident was caused by another vehicle and the insured vehicle was stationary, hence no liability.

Previous Decisions

M.A.C.T., Solapur awarded compensation of Rs.8,96,550/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a. against respondent no.3 (owner) and appellant (insurer) jointly and severally.

Issues

Whether the insurer of the stationary Tavera Jeep is liable for the death of a third party caused by another vehicle? Whether the Tribunal erred in holding the appellant jointly and severally liable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the accident was solely due to the negligence of the Omni car driver, and the insured vehicle was stationary, thus no liability. Respondents argued that the deceased was a third party and the accident occurred while she was alighting from the insured vehicle, making the insurer liable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle was established, and the insurer of the stationary vehicle cannot be held liable for the accident caused by another vehicle. However, by consent of parties, the appeal was dismissed, and the award was upheld.

Judgment Excerpts

By this First Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellant (original opponent no.2) has impugned the judgment and award dated 3rd December, 2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Solapur in M.A.C.P. No. 258 of 2010 awarding compensation of Rs.8,96,550/- together with interest @ 7.5% p.a. It was the case of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 that the said accident had taken place only due to the negligence on the part of the said driver of the offending vehicle.

Procedural History

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 filed M.A.C.P. No. 258 of 2010 before M.A.C.T., Solapur under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal passed judgment and award on 3rd December, 2015. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 665 of 2019 under Section 173 of the Act. The appeal was heard finally at admission stage by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Third Party. Insurer Liable Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite Stationary Vehicle, as Negligence of Other Driver Proved.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Dying declaration recorded by police officer without medical certification held inadmissible under Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.