Search Results for "Gazette publication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Gazette publication"

1255 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1255 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner Failed to Prove Respondent's Inability to Pay Debts as Statutory Notice Not Served at Registered Office.

10 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Store One Retail India Ltd., filed a company petition under the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent, Waterfall In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against GOL Offshore Ltd. Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Absence of Commercial Insolvency. Debt Not Due and Payable Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

5 May 2017

The judgment concerns two winding up petitions filed by Export-Import Bank of India and Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. against GOL Offshore...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Development — Acquisition Not Vitiated by Delay or Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners failed to demonstrate that the acquisition was for a purpose other than public purpose or that the procedure under the Act was not followed.

5 May 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against Respondent — Disputed Debt and Bona Fide Defence Preclude Admission. The court held that a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be admitted when the debt is bona fide disputed and the company has a substantial defence, as the remedy is not for recovery of debt but for insolvency.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioner,  filed two winding up petitions under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Respondent., seeking winding up on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Winding Up Order Due to Defective Advertisement Under Rule 99 of Company Court Rules, 1959. Failure to Advertise in Correct Name of Company Violates Mandatory Requirement and Cannot Be Cured by Inherent Powers.

26 Sep 2018

The appeal challenged an order dated 21 June 2018 by which the learned Company Judge allowed Company Petition No. 829 of 2003 filed by SICOM Limited f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Winding-Up Petition, Sets Aside Conditional Deposit Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute over unpaid dues under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 cannot be adjudicated in winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

10 Oct 2018

The appeal arose from an order dated 27 September 2017 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No. 192 of 2016, directing the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Amendment Requiring Prior Approval for Transfer of School Management in Maharashtra. The Court held that Section 5A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, inserted by Maharashtra Act No. V of 2018, is constitutionally valid and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

21 Nov 2018

The petitioners, various educational societies and institutions, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Act No. V of 2018, which in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging BDA Acquisition Notification for Lack of Alternative Remedy and Delay. Petitioners' challenge to preliminary notification under Section 17 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 fails as they did not avail statutory remedy of filing objections under Section 17(3) and approached court after 16 years.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioners, including a housing cooperative society and several individuals, filed writ petitions challenging the preliminary notification dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Non-Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Members — Petitioners Lack Locus Standi. No-Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioners, who are residents and social workers of Ujani village, filed writ petitions challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the m...

76 77 78 79 80

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)