Search Results for "Central Services"

4607 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4607 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Moratorium on New Pharmacy Colleges Under Pharmacy Act, 1948. Regulatory Power to Impose Moratorium Valid as Reasonable Restriction Under Article 19(6) to Prevent Mushrooming Growth and Unemployment.

The Supreme Court of India addressed appeals filed by the Pharmacy Council of India challenging judgments from the High Courts of Karnataka, Delhi, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows BH Series Registration for Petitioner's Motor Car Under Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. Denial of Registration Without Written Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra Bansilal Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the action of the Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging RBI and Central Government Actions Under Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Interim Stay Granted Against Amalgamation. Court Finds Prima Facie Haste and Lack of Propriety in Decision-Making Process Leading to Status Quo Ante Restoration.

The matter involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions taken by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Central Gover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Suspended Director in IL&FS Accounts Reopening Case — Recasting Permitted Under Section 130 Companies Act. Court holds that SFIO and ICAI reports provide sufficient basis for reopening accounts and that suspended director lacks locus standi.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Hari Sankaran, a suspended director of Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited (IL&FS), against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Pension Case, Upholding Tribunal's Inclusion of Past Commission Bearer Service. Consistent with Supreme Court's Munshi Ram, All Railway Employees Must Receive Equal Pension Benefits Without Zone-Based Discrimination.

The case concerned a service dispute over the pensionary benefits of a railway employee who had previously worked as a Commission Bearer. The responde...