Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cessation of Nominee Directors in Co-operative Society Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court holds that the term of nominated directors automatically ceases upon expiry of the nominating authority's term, and no right of hearing is required before such cessation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Pune Zilla Sahakri Doodh Utpadak Sangh, a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged the communication dated 30th June 2016 issued by the Divisional Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies (Dairy), Mumbai, which stated that the term of the nominated directors on the board of the petitioner had ceased. The petitioner argued that the nominated directors were entitled to continue until their successors were appointed and that they should have been given a hearing before being removed. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and various dairy development authorities, contended that the nomination was co-terminus with the term of the nominating authority, which had expired, and thus the cessation was automatic. The court analyzed Section 73B of the Act, which provides for nomination of directors by the State Government, and noted that the term of such nominated directors is linked to the term of the authority that nominates them. The court held that upon expiry of the term of the nominating authority, the nominated directors cease to hold office automatically, and no separate order or hearing is required. The court dismissed the petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's contentions.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Cessation of Nominated Directors - Section 73B, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The term of directors nominated by the State Government ceases automatically upon the expiry of the term of the nominating authority, and no separate order or hearing is required for such cessation. The court held that the nomination is co-terminus with the term of the authority that made the nomination. (Paras 5-7)

B) Co-operative Law - Right of Hearing - Section 27, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The principle of natural justice (audi alteram partem) does not apply to the cessation of nominated directors upon expiry of the nominating authority's term, as the cessation is automatic by operation of law and not a punitive removal. The court held that no hearing is required before the expiry of the term. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the term of directors nominated by the State Government under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 ceases automatically upon the expiry of the term of the nominating authority, and whether such directors are entitled to a hearing before their cessation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The court held that the term of nominated directors ceases automatically upon expiry of the term of the nominating authority, and no hearing is required before such cessation.

Law Points

  • Cessation of term of nominated directors upon expiry of nominating authority's term
  • No right of hearing before cessation of nominated directors
  • Interpretation of Section 73B of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Applicability of Section 27 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (04) 63

Writ Petition No. 8771 of 2016

2026-04-21

A. S. Gadkari, Kamal Khata

Shekhar Jagtap, Sairuchita Chowdhary, J. Shekhar Associates for the Petitioner; Reena A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State

Pune Zilla Sahakri Doodh Utpadak Sangh

State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the communication dated 30th June 2016 issued by the Divisional Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies (Dairy), Mumbai, stating that the term of nominated directors on the board of the petitioner society had ceased.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the communication and a declaration that the nominated directors are entitled to continue until their successors are appointed.

Filing Reason

The petitioner contended that the nominated directors should not have been removed without a hearing and that their term should continue until successors are appointed.

Issues

Whether the term of directors nominated under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 ceases automatically upon expiry of the term of the nominating authority. Whether nominated directors are entitled to a hearing before cessation of their term.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the nominated directors are entitled to continue until their successors are appointed and that they should have been given a hearing before being removed. Respondents argued that the nomination is co-terminus with the term of the nominating authority, which had expired, and thus cessation is automatic; no hearing is required.

Ratio Decidendi

The term of directors nominated under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is co-terminus with the term of the nominating authority. Upon expiry of that term, the nominated directors cease to hold office automatically by operation of law, and no separate order or hearing is required. The principle of natural justice (audi alteram partem) does not apply to automatic cessation by expiry of term.

Judgment Excerpts

The term of the nominated directors is co-terminus with the term of the authority which nominates them. Upon expiry of the term of the nominating authority, the nominated directors cease to hold office automatically and no separate order is required. The principle of audi alteram partem does not apply to the cessation of nominated directors upon expiry of the term.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the communication dated 30th June 2016. The petition was reserved on 9th April 2026 and pronounced on 21st April 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 73B, Section 27
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cessation of Nominee Directors in Co-operative Society Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court holds that the term of nominated directors automatically ceases upon expiry of the nomin...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Leasehold Conversion Case: Conversion Charges Payable at Rate Prevalent on Date of Decision, Not Application. The Court held that an applicant must comply with policy conditions and no vested right arises on mere ...