Search Results for "Article 173"

1058 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1058 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Reserved Category Candidate Seeking Appointment Against Horizontally Reserved Post. Principle of Vertical Reservation Held Inapplicable to Horizontal Reservation for Women Under Articles 16(1) and 15(3) of Constitution.

The petitioner, a female belonging to the Scheduled Caste, applied for the post of Pharmacist in response to an advertisement by Zilla Parishad, Beed,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Concerning Recruitment Selection List Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Final Select List Prepared by Maharashtra Public Service Commission; Court's Decision Not Extracted from Provided Text.

The provided judgment text comprises only the preliminary pages of a judgment from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, specifically the case heade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...