Search Results for "wrong rule"

5035 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5035 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Plaintiff's 11-Month Delay and Lack of Genuine Urgency Leads to Relegation to Mediation.

The plaintiff, Ultra Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit alleging copyright infringement of the character 'Shaktimaan' by the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSC's Challenge to MAT Orders Directing Recommendation of Candidates for Assistant Executive Engineer Posts. Candidates' Marks in Civil Engineering Paper Were Wrongly Reduced Due to Incorrect Answer Key, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) conducted a recruitment process for the post of Assistant Executive Engineer. The respondents, who we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Advocate-on-Record and Senior Advocate for Suppression of Facts in Criminal Appeal. Court Considers Need for Code of Conduct for Advocates-on-Record and Reconsideration of Indira Jaising Decisions.

The Supreme Court was hearing a criminal appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition filed by a convict who had been sentenced to 30 years imprisonme...