Search Results for "total denial defence"

1813 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1813 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S Ramesh Kumar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Decree for Non-Compliance with Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Pay Balance Consideration, Rendering Specific Performance Unwarranted.

The case involves a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendant No. 2 (appellant) challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Human Trafficking Case Under Section 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Minor Girls Rescued from Brothel, Evidence of Detention and Cruelty Established.

The case involves the conviction of Smt. Rita Dilip Ghosh (the applicant) under Section 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (PITA) for det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal by Bank Manager Convicted of Forgery and Corruption. Court Examines Prosecution Evidence and Notes Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act for Non-Examination of Material Witnesses.

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Special Judge for CBI cases convicting the appellant, a former branch manager of Syndicate Bank, for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Cruelty and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Multiple and Inconsistent Dying Declarations, Possibility of Tutoring, and Failure to Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Led to Acquittal.

The appellant, Mohd. Salim, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for subjecting the deceased, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Petitions for Regularization of Services of Bangalore University Employees. Petitioners Sought Formal Orders of Regularization Pursuant to Government Directives and Earlier Court Orders.

Multiple writ petitions were filed by employees working in various capacities at Bangalore University. The petitioners sought regularization of their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Applies Pranay Sethi Principles for Future Prospects and Multiplier. Deceased Agricultural Labourer's Dependents Granted Rs.6,84,000 with 6% Interest.

The appellants, being the wife, father, and two minor sons of the deceased Madhu Kondiba Gavali, filed a claim application under Section 166 of the Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Defendant Guilty of Contempt for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Copyright and Passing Off Case. Defendant's Continued Use of Deceptively Similar Trade Dress Despite Court Order Constitutes Contempt Under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC.

The Plaintiff, Cargil India Private Limited, a subsidiary of Cargil Inc., is engaged in the business of edible oils and holds copyright in the packagi...