Bombay High Court Holds Defendant Guilty of Contempt for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Copyright and Passing Off Case. Defendant's Continued Use of Deceptively Similar Trade Dress Despite Court Order Constitutes Contempt Under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Plaintiff, Cargil India Private Limited, a subsidiary of Cargil Inc., is engaged in the business of edible oils and holds copyright in the packaging of its 'GEMINI-Refined Sunflower Oil'. The Defendant, M/s M.M. Oil Enterprises, a proprietary concern of Aslam Noor Mohammad Siddiqui, adopted a deceptively similar trade dress for its product 'GENUINE-Refined Sunflower Oil'. The Plaintiff filed a suit for copyright infringement and passing off in March 2017, and obtained an ex-parte ad-interim injunction on 23rd March 2017 restraining the Defendant from using the impugned packaging. Despite the injunction, the Defendant continued to manufacture and sell products with the infringing packaging. The Plaintiff filed the present Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC for contempt of court. The Court examined the evidence, including photographs and invoices, and found that the Defendant had willfully disobeyed the injunction. The Defendant's proprietor admitted to continuing production but claimed ignorance of the injunction. The Court rejected this defense, noting that the Defendant was represented by counsel and had knowledge of the order. The Court held the Defendant guilty of contempt and directed the Defendant to be committed to civil prison for a period of three months, and also imposed a fine of Rs. 2,000. The Court further ordered that the Defendant's proprietor be detained until the fine is paid. The motion was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Contempt of Court - Willful Disobedience of Injunction - Order 39 Rule 2-A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The Plaintiff sought contempt action against the Defendant for violating an interim injunction restraining use of deceptively similar trade dress for edible oil packaging - The Court found that the Defendant continued to manufacture and sell products with the impugned packaging despite knowledge of the injunction, constituting willful disobedience - Held that the Defendant is guilty of contempt and liable for punishment (Paras 1-30).

B) Intellectual Property - Copyright Infringement - Passing Off - Deceptively Similar Trade Dress - The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant's 'GENUINE-Refined Sunflower Oil' packaging was deceptively similar to Plaintiff's 'GEMINI-Refined Sunflower Oil' packaging, amounting to copyright infringement and passing off - The Court had earlier granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining such use - The present motion was for contempt for violation of that injunction (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Defendant has willfully disobeyed the interim injunction granted by the Court on 23rd March 2017 by continuing to use the impugned packaging, and whether the Defendant should be punished for contempt under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court held the Defendant guilty of contempt of court under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC. The Defendant was ordered to be committed to civil prison for a period of three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000. The Defendant's proprietor was directed to be detained until the fine is paid. The Notice of Motion was disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Contempt of court
  • willful disobedience of injunction
  • Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC
  • copyright infringement
  • passing off
  • deceptively similar trade dress
  • interim relief
  • commercial division
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-OS:9636

Notice of Motion No. 1107 of 2019 in COMIP Suit No. 425 of 2017

2019-05-16

S.J. Kathawalla, J.

2019:BHC-OS:9636

Mr. Rohan Kadam a/w. Ms. Chaitrika Patki i/b. Anand and Anand and Khimani for the Applicant/Plaintiff; Mr. Pol i/b. Pol Legal Juris for the Defendant; Mr. Aslam Noor Mohammad Siddiqui - Proprietor of the Defendant, present in person

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for contempt of court for willful disobedience of an interim injunction granted in a suit for copyright infringement and passing off.

Remedy Sought

The Plaintiff sought to punish the Defendant for contempt of court for violating the interim injunction order dated 23rd March 2017.

Filing Reason

The Defendant continued to manufacture and sell edible oil products with a deceptively similar trade dress despite being restrained by the Court's injunction.

Previous Decisions

On 23rd March 2017, the Court granted ex-parte ad-interim relief restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff's copyright and from using the impugned packaging.

Issues

Whether the Defendant has willfully disobeyed the interim injunction granted on 23rd March 2017. Whether the Defendant is guilty of contempt under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that despite the injunction, the Defendant continued to manufacture and sell products with the impugned packaging, as evidenced by photographs and invoices. Defendant's proprietor claimed ignorance of the injunction and stated that he had stopped production after receiving the order, but the Court found evidence of continued sales.

Ratio Decidendi

Willful disobedience of a court's injunction order constitutes contempt of court under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC. Ignorance of the order is no defense when the party was represented by counsel and had knowledge of the proceedings. The court must enforce its orders to uphold the rule of law.

Judgment Excerpts

The above Notice of Motion is taken out by the Plaintiff - Cargil India Private Limited under Order 39, Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. By an Order dated 23rd March, 2017, this Court granted ex-parte ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer Clauses (a) to (c) of Notice of Motion No. 968 of 2017.

Procedural History

The Plaintiff filed COMIP Suit No. 425 of 2017 on 15th March 2017 for copyright infringement and passing off. On 23rd March 2017, the Court granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction. The Plaintiff then filed Notice of Motion No. 1107 of 2019 under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC for contempt. The motion was heard and decided on 16th May 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 39 Rule 2-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Holds Defendant Guilty of Contempt for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Copyright and Passing Off Case. Defendant's Continued Use of Deceptively Similar Trade Dress Despite Court Order Constitutes Contempt Under Order 39 Rule 2...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Revisional Order Due to Inordinate Delay in Filing Revision. Revisional Authority Erred in Entertaining Revision After Eight Years Without Considering Reasonable Time Limitation Under Maharashtra Land R...