Search Results for "settlement stay"

1159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with 34 IPC for assaulting victim due to Facebook dispute settlement, but acquitted of conspiracy and harbouring.

The appellants, original accused nos.1 to 3, were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.314 of 2014 for the of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim and Enhances Son's Maintenance in Section 125 CrPC Case — Family Court Erred in Denying Maintenance to Wife Based on Earning Capacity Alone; Son's Maintenance Enhanced from Rs.500 to Rs.1,500 Per Month.

The revision petition was filed by the wife and minor son against the order dated 14.10.2010 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum in Criminal Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds 12% Interest Rate on Fixed Deposit After Maturity in Co-operative Society Dispute. Court holds that in absence of contractual rate, interest under Section 34 CPC is applicable, rejecting both 6% and 17% claims.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of a learned single Judge of the Karnataka High Court regarding the rate of interest payable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...