Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1851 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1851 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 504, 506 r/w 149 IPC.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 25.11.2014 passed by the I Addl. Sessions Judge, Vijayapur in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial Evidence of Identification and Discovery Forms Basis of Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The matter arises out of a reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Death of Respondents. Acquittal of Public Servants under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 20.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 394 read with 34 IPC for killing a person over a petty sum of Rs. 50.

The case pertains to the murder of Bapu Rustum Salgar on 23 October 2004. The appellants, Sanjay and Anna Upadhe, were convicted by the Additional Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120-B, 203 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence.

The appellant, Dinesh Thakare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Chandrapur, for the murder of his wife Harsha under Sections 302, 201, 120-B and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extracted text.

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as eyewitness testimony was found unreliable and uncorroborated, with long-standing enmity casting doubt on prosecution case.

The dispute arose from a murder case where the appellants were convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Narayan on Sept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Six Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal appeal filed by six accused persons against their conviction by the II Additional District a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for LSD Possession — Compliance with Sections 50 and 52-A Established. Court finds no tampering with contraband and affirms ten-year rigorous imprisonment for possession of commercial quantity of LSD.

The appellant, Subodh Levi, was convicted by the Special Court under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...