Search Results for "quality evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "quality evidence"

2252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2252 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Loan vs. Capital Contribution and Rejection of Counterclaim as Not Maintainable. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 failed.

23 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Shekhar Appu Shetty, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Rape of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 376 IPC.

20 Mar 2014

The appellant, Sharad Bhaskar Rajnor, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for offences under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.

7 Apr 2026

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial Evidence of Identification and Discovery Forms Basis of Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

30 Jul 2015

The matter arises out of a reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Gang-Related Assault Case. Court Confirms Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC for Fatal Stabbing and 10 Years Under Section 307 IPC for Injuring Victim, Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

11 Jun 2024

The case arises from an incident on 22nd March 2011, where the deceased Suraj @ Balu Shabbir Magdum and injured Rohan Sakate (PW-3) were assaulted by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Sand Removal Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of contractual terms was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not violate public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2021

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Permanency for Work Charged Deputy Engineer in Municipal Council — Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court held that a Deputy Engineer appointed on work charged basis who worked for more than 3 years is a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the employer's failure to make him permanent despite availability of permanent posts amounts to unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

12 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 22.7.1998 which allowed the complaint filed by Resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement Set Aside for Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's increase from Rs.80,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per hectare quashed as claimants failed to produce any documentary evidence to justify enhancement under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 read with Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

8 Jun 2017

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against the judgment and order of the Reference Cour...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Cross Petitions on Industrial Court's Decision Regarding Permanency of Temporary Municipal Workers. The Determination Turns on Compliance with BPMC Act and MRTU & PULP Act, Including Model Standing Order 4C.

7 Jun 2010

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from a complaint filed by temporary workers of Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation under the Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeals in Land Acquisition Case for Police Training School — Enhances Compensation from Rs. 150 to Rs. 200 per sq. mtr. Market Value Determined by Comparable Sale Method Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with Statutory Benefits of Solatium and Additional Amount.

1 Jul 2024

The case involves appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, against a common judgment and award dated 08/04/2013 passed by the Refer...

75 76 77 78 79

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)