Search Results for "property definition"

3000 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3000 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Private Individuals in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR Quashed as No Sanction Obtained for Prosecution of Public Servants, Making Proceedings Against Applicants for Conspiracy Not Maintainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Civil Revision Application in Eviction Proceeding under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Landlord's contention of alternate accommodation by tenant and willful default were key issues.

The dispute centered on a shop admeasuring 15' x 20' ft. out of House No.1270/6 at Gunj Golai, Latur, owned by the late Vishwambhar Kulkarni. After hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Definition of Loan Under Maharashtra Money-Lending Act. Classification Between Interest-Free Advances and Loans at Interest Held Not Arbitrary Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Fauzan Shaikh, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of clauses (j) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Relationship During Subsistence of Marriage Not Recognized as 'Relationship in Nature of Marriage'

The Petitioner, filed a Writ Petition seeking relief under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA, 2005) claiming her relationshi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...