Search Results for "medical evidence corroboration"

2019 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2019 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dowry Demand. Dying Declaration Did Not Mention Dowry Demand, and Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty Soon Before Death Under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents (accused) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 50/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not support rape and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sunil Sable, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Dhule, for offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and other offences. The appellants were convicted by the trial court for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Pilgrim Fair Incident. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained as Medical and Testimonial Evidence Corroborated Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Bhagwan @ Maharu Ragho Koli, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 50...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demand 'soon before her death'.

The appellant, Mangesh Deorao Kannake, was convicted under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code for the dowry death of his wife, Shefali. The marriag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Paramesha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.146/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Ratan @ Vishvajit Manoranjan Bose, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 363, 366...