Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Pilgrim Fair Incident. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained as Medical and Testimonial Evidence Corroborated Prosecution Case.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Bhagwan @ Maharu Ragho Koli, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in Sessions Case No. 114 of 2012, dated 16-01-2014. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2000/- for the rape offence, and rigorous imprisonment for two years and a fine of Rs.500/- for criminal intimidation. The incident occurred on 04-03-2012 during a pilgrim fair in village Ner, Dhule. The prosecutrix, an 8-year-old girl, was given a coconut by the appellant and taken to a field where he sexually assaulted her. She returned home weeping with bleeding injuries on her private parts. Her parents took her to the hospital and later filed an FIR. The appellant appealed against the conviction under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of the child prosecutrix, her parents, and medical evidence. The court found the child's testimony credible and corroborated by medical reports showing injuries. The court also noted that the appellant was known to the victim. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Rape of Minor - Section 376(2)(f) IPC - Corroboration - The appellant was convicted for raping an 8-year-old girl during a pilgrim fair. The court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix, though a child witness, was reliable and corroborated by medical evidence showing injuries to her private parts. The conviction was upheld. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Criminal Intimidation - Section 506 IPC - The appellant was also convicted for threatening the victim. The court found the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction under Section 506(i) IPC. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 376(2)(f) and 506(i) IPC for the rape of an 8-year-old girl is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 376(2)(f) and 506(i) IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Rape of minor
  • Section 376(2)(f) IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
  • Corroboration of testimony
  • Medical evidence
  • Life imprisonment
  • Appeal against conviction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (10) 24

Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2014

2019-10-16

T.V. Nalawade, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. Joydeep Chatterji for Appellant, Mrs. V. S. Choudhari for Respondent - State

Bhagwan @ Maharu Ragho Koli

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for rape and criminal intimidation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for rape of an 8-year-old girl.

Previous Decisions

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Sessions Case No. 114 of 2012 on 16-01-2014.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of the child prosecutrix and medical evidence. Whether the conviction under Section 506(i) IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and the child witness was unreliable. State argued that the testimony of the prosecutrix was corroborated by medical evidence and the conviction was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of a child witness, if found credible and corroborated by medical evidence, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for rape. The court held that the medical evidence of injuries to the private parts of the victim corroborated her testimony, and the appellant was rightly convicted.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant – original accused – Bhagwan @ Maharu Ragho Koli is convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 506 (i) of Indian Penal Code (IPC) in Sessions Case No. 114 of 2012, dated 16-01-2014. The appellant-accused, taking recourse of remedy under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974 (Cr.P.C.), knocked the door of this Court and filed present appeal to redress his grievance.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, on 16-01-2014. He appealed to the Bombay High Court under Section 374 Cr.P.C. The appeal was reserved on 23-09-2019 and decided on 16-10-2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376(2)(f), 506(i)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974 (Cr.P.C.): 374
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint for Non-Payment of Court Fees in Commercial Suit. Court upholds trial court's order rejecting plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) CPC for failure to pay deficit court fees within extended t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Pilgrim Fair Incident. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained as Medical and Testimonial Evidence Corroborated Prosecution Case.