Search Results for "agreement purchaser"

1840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The appellant, Aravind S/o Krishnaji Kulkarni, filed Regular Second Appeal No.161/2002 against the judgment and decree dated 4.9.2001 passed in R.A.No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Sets Aside Tenancy Authority's Orders in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Authorities' Approach of First Examining Plaintiffs' Possession Rather Than Defendant's Burden of Proof Held Perverse.

The dispute arose from an agricultural land bearing Survey No. 93/3 (Gut No. 262) at village Vangal, Satara, classified as Personal Inam Class II land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Defendant’s Appeal and Dismisses Plaintiff’s Appeal in Specific Performance Suit. Oral Agreement to Reconvey Property Not Proved; Decree Based on Defendant’s Written Statement Admission Set Aside Due to Non-Acceptance by Plaintiff.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to reconvey property. The plaintiff, originally the owner of the suit prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Vacate Injunction. Court holds that a tenant cannot be dispossessed without due process of law and that the trial court's order refusing to vacate ad-interim injunction was not perverse.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 24th June 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge on Applications at Exh.5 and Exh.36 in Special Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Barge Sale Agreement. Jurisdictional Objection Must Be Decided Before Granting or Refusing Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against...