Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1788 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1788 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Husband — No Custodial Detention Found. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in police custody and his whereabouts are unknown.

The petitioner, Usharani, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the police auth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Bidders to Be from SC/ST Community. Condition Held Valid as Affirmative Action for Upliftment of SC/ST Communities, Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, eleven pump manufacturing companies, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a tend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...