Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8811 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8811 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Temporary Authorisation and NOC for Vehicles with Cancelled Fitness Certificates. Authorities Directed to Accept Tax Dues and Issue No Objection Certificate Under Section 48 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Geekom Logistech Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in transport business, owned a fleet of vehicl...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch; Meeting Convened Within Two Days Valid Under 1975 Rules. Special meeting for no-confidence motion under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act and the 1975 Rules does not require three clear days' notice as per Rule 4 of Meetings Rules 1959, and meeting held within seven days is sufficient.

2 Jul 2018

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Kawalgaon, Taluka Degloor, District Nan...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition in Births and Deaths Registration Matter — Registrar Directed to Correct Birth Certificate Entries Under Section 15 of Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969. The Court held that the Registrar has statutory power to correct erroneous entries in form or substance, including changes to father's and mother's names based on adoption and divorce, and a writ of mandamus lies to compel exercise of such power.

12 Mar 2026

Background: The case involved a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the refusal of the Registrar of Births and Deaths ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Petitioner's Trade Mark for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Removal of Trade Mark 'CIPLA' Held Void as Registrar Failed to Send O-3 Notice to Registered Proprietor, Contravening Statutory Mandate.

23 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Cipla Limited, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the removal of its registered trade mark 'CIPLA' from the register and a mandamus ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Condonation of 9-Year Delay in Filing Appeal Against Ex Parte Decree in Recovery Suit. The Court Held that the Question of Non-Service of Summons Cannot Be Agitated in a Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the Appropriate Remedy Lies Under Order IX Rule 13.

31 Jul 2013

The matter originated from a suit for recovery of possession (R.C.S. No. 346 of 1995) filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) against the respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Air India's Standing Order 17 Which Permits Termination Without Assigning Reasons. The Court Considered Whether Such Unguided Power Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

25 Feb 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by employees of Air India Limited (formerly NACIL) whose services were terminated under Standing Ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Transfer Approvals in Education Law — Transfer from Unaided to Aided School Not Fresh Recruitment. Government Resolutions Banning Fresh Recruitment Held Inapplicable to Transfers of Employees Appointed Prior to Ban Under Rule 41 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

1 Oct 2021

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, examined the validity of orders passed by the Educ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Transposition of Defendant as Plaintiff in Partition Suit Under Order 23 Rule 1A CPC. The Court examined whether a defendant with a conflicting interest could be transposed as plaintiff when the original plaintiff partially withdrew from the suit, focusing on the applicability of Order 23 Rule 1A CPC to partial withdrawal and the effect of a compromise not binding on the transposed defendant.

20 Mar 2023

In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules in Favor of Wife Challenging Family Court's Amendment Order in Divorce Proceedings Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Trial Commences Upon Filing of Affidavit in Lieu of Evidence, Making Post-Commencement Amendment Subject to Proviso Due Diligence Requirement.

9 Jun 2025

The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between a wife and husband. The husband had filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Formation of Animal Welfare Committee to Resolve Dispute Over Feeding of Stray Dogs in Housing Society. The court held that under Rule 20 of the Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023, the Resident Welfare Association must designate feeding spots and times, and in case of conflict, an Animal Welfare Committee must be formed by the local authority to make a final decision.

2 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court dealt with a dispute between a housing society (the petitioner) and one of its residents (the 5th respondent) regarding the feed...

75 76 77 78 79

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)