Search Results for "writ petition common order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "writ petition common order"

6825 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6825 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration — Holds Designated Committee Cannot Reopen Final Assessment Order. Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 declaration must be processed based on declared tax dues as per final assessment order, not on show cause notice demand.

9 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Eureka Fabricators Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing unit holding central excise registration, was issued a show cause-cum-demand notice date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Decision and Upholds Dismissal of Second Suit on Grounds of Res Judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC. The Court held that the second suit was barred as it involved the same parties, subject matter, and cause of action as the first suit, and the High Court erred in interfering with concurrent findings under Section 100 CPC.

9 Apr 2026

The dispute originated from an adoption deed dated March 23, 1961, where Respondent allegedly adopted Channappa. In 2002, Respondent filed Suit-I (O.S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

7 May 2010

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

High Court

KAHC010168012022_1

3 Sep 2022

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Police Order Restricting Entry to Educational Society Premises Under Section 39(1) of Bombay Police Act — Order Held Disproportionate and Without Proper Application of Mind. The court held that a preventive order under Section 39(1) must be based on material showing imminent danger of breach of peace and cannot be used to decide civil disputes over management of a society.

26 Jul 2013

The petitioners, Anandraj Y. Ambedkar and others, challenged an order dated 6 July 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 39...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

4 Jan 2019

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Cancelling Fair Price Shop License Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955. License Cancellation Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem Principle.

4 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Bansilal Agrawal, was a licensee of a fair price shop under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Minister of Food, Civil Su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Summary Assessment Under Section 62 of MGST Act Due to Technical Glitches and Non-Service of Order. The court directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits, condoning the delay caused by technical issues and non-service of the assessment order.

3 Dec 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Meritas Hotels Pvt. Ltd., challenged the action of respondent no.5 (Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeals-IV)) in refusing to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Commercial Appeal No. 38 of 2017: Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award under MSMED Act. Issues of Limitation, Mis-joinder of Causes of Action, and Territorial Jurisdiction Raised in Challenge to Award for Interest on Delayed Payments.

31 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Delton Electricals, a partnership firm and small scale industrial unit, filed Original Application No. 1 of 2005 before the Micro ...

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)