CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "substantial implementation"
1148 result(s) found
Found 1148 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order in Section 263 Revision Case. Appeal Concerns Whether Non-Verification of Utilization of Accumulated Income Under Section 11(2) Renders Assessment Order Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue.
4 May 2026The matter arose from an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the Bombay High Court against the order of the In...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appellate Order Denying GST Refund on Export of Services to Overseas Entity, Holds Non-Submission of FIRCs Not Fatal When Alternative Proof Exists. The Court Rules that Services Provided on Principal-to-Principal Basis Are Not Intermediary Services Under Section 2(13) of IGST Act, and Directs Refund.
22 Aug 2024The petitioner, a company providing information technology and software services, filed four applications for refund of unutilized input tax credit (I...
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines
8 Apr 2026The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to MoEF Direction for Demolition of Compound Wall in CRZ Area — Non-Compliance with Environmental Clearance Conditions and Environment Protection Act, 1986 Justifies Direction. Construction of Compound Wall Without Necessary Approvals in Coastal Regulation Zone Violates Environmental Regulations.
10 Jun 2016The writ petition arose from a solid waste management project established by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai at Kanjur Marg, Mumbai. The M...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Second Appeal Against Partition Decree; Challenge to Lower Appellate Court's Grant of 1/4th Share in Joint Family Properties. Plaintiff Claimed Share via Will but Court Rejected Will Yet Allowed Partition, Now Appellants Contend Family Settlement Extinguished All Shares.
4 Apr 2016The second appeal before the Bombay High Court arises out of a partition suit. The plaintiff, Smt. Sushila, filed a suit for declaration, partition, a...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Considers Second Appeal in Partition Suit Involving Joint Family Property and Competing Claims Under Two Wills. The Court Examines the Effect of a Prior Family Settlement and Memorandum of Partition on the Plaintiff’s Right to a Share in the Estate of the Deceased Female Coparcener.
4 Apr 2016Background — The dispute concerned joint family properties left by Jethmalji, who died in November 1956, survived by his widow Smt. Heerabai and ste...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes Civil and Criminal Writ Petitions Regarding Welfare and Property of an Elderly Woman and Animal Shelter. Trust Constituted for Management of Affairs of a Bed-Ridden Woman Without Heirs, Under Provisions of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
6 Oct 2015The judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay delivered on 6 October 2015 disposed of two writ petitions, one civil and one criminal, along w...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Dispute Over Supply of Pulverised Fly Ash from Thermal Power Plant. The petitions, filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek to set aside the award that rejected claims for specific performance and damages arising from an agreement dated 4 October 2000.
24 Jul 2014The dispute arose from a long-term agreement dated 4 October 2000 between Dirk India Private Limited (Dirk India) and Maharashtra State Electricity Ge...
- 17
High Court
High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.
23 Apr 2014The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...
- 20
